Website is intended for physicians
Search:
Всего найдено: 4

 

Abstract:

Article presents a case report of successful antegrade x-ray surgical access to the biliary tree ir order to eliminate partial clipping of the common bile duct as a complication of endoscopic cholecystectomy

Percutaneous transhepatic puncture of the unexpanded biliary tree was made under ultrasounc control without auxiliary contrast enhancement of the bile tree. After punction - antegrade cholangiography revealed partial clipping of common bile duct. Patient underwent balloon dilatation, internal-external transpapillaty drainage. Three-times balloon dilatation after each 2 months made it possible to avoid the formation of posttraumatic stricture and the long-frame external-internal drainage of the biliary tree.

The use of antegrade percutaneous transhepatic access to restore adequate passage of bile to the duodenum, including cases without dissection of the papilla, is advisable in clinical situations that do not allow the use of retrograde endoscopic access, or if it is ineffective. 

 

References

1.      Kuznecov N.A., Sokolov A.A., Brontvein A.T., Artemkin EH.N. Diagnostics and treatment of early biliary complications after a cholecystectomy. Khirurgiya. 2011; 3: 3-7 [In Russ].

2.      Eisenstein S, Greenstein AJ, Kim U, Divino CM. Cystic duct stump leaks: after the learning curve. Arch Surg. 2008; 143( 12): 1178-83. doi: 10.1001/archsurg. 143.12.1178.

3.      Shaikh IA, Thomas H, Joga K (et al.). Post-cholecystectomy cystic duct stump leak: a preventable morbidity. J Dig Dis. 2009 Aug; 10(3):207-12. doi: 10.1111/j. 1751 - 2980.2009.00387.x.

4.      Barband AR, Kakaei F, Daryani A, FakhreeMB. Relaparoscopy in minor bile leakage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an alternative approach? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Aug; 21 (4):288-91. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31822a2373.

5.      Shawhan RR, Porta CR, Bingham JR (et al.). Biliary leak rates after cholecystectomy and intraoperative cholangiogram in surgical residency. Mil Med. 2015 May; 180(5):565-9. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00426.

6.      Lo Nigro C, Geraci G, Sciuto A, (et al.).Bile leaks after videolaparoscopic cholecystectomy: duct of Luschka. Endoscopic treatment in a single centre and brief literature review on current management. Ann Ital Chir. 2012 Jul-Aug; 83(4):303-12.

7.      Doumenc B, Boutros M, Dйgremont R, Bouras AF. Biliary leakage from gallbladder bed after cholecystectomy: Luschka duct or hepaticocholecystic duct? Morpholo- gie. 2016 Mar; 100(328):36-40. doi: 10.1016/j.morpho.2015.08.003.

8.      Pancyrev YU.M., SHapoval'yanc S.G., CHernyakevich S.A., et al. Functional disorders of a sphincter of Oddi after a cholecystectomy. RGGK. 2011; 3(21):28-34 [In Russ].

9.      Ohotnikov O.I., YAkovleva M.V., Grigor'ev S.N. X-ray surgery of «small» damages of bilious channels during cholecystectomy. Annaly hirurgicheskoj gepatologii.2017; 1(22):64-70 [In Russ].

10.    Sinha R, Chandra S. Cystic duct leaks after laparoendoscopic single-site cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Jul-Aug; 22(6):533-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0094.

11.    Kim KH, Kim TN. Endoscopic management of bile leakage after cholecystectomy: a single-center experience for 12 years. Clin Endosc. 2014 May; 47(3):248-53. doi: 10.5946/ce.2014.47.3.248.

12.    Beburishvili A.G., Zubina E.N., Akinchits A.N., Vedenin YI. External biliary leakage after different types of cholecystectomy: diagnostics and treatment. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii. 2009; 14 (3): 18-21 [In Russ].

13.    Gwon D, Ko GY Sung KB, Kim JH, Yoon HK. Percutaneous transhepatic treatment of postoperative bile leaks: prospective evaluation of retrievable covered stent. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011 Jan;22(1 ):75-83. doi: 10.1016/ j.jvir. 2010.10.004.

14.    de Jong EA, Moelker A, Leertouwer T, Spronk S, Van Dijk M, van Eijck CH. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with postsurgical bile leakage and nondilated intrahepatic bile ducts. Dig Surg. 2013;30(4- 6):444-50. doi: 10.1159/000356711.

15.    Ohotnikov O.I. YAkovleva M.V. Grigor'ev S.N. Transhepatic cholangiostomy in nondilated intrahepatic bile ducts. Annaly hirurgicheskoj gepatologii. 2015; 1(20): 84-90 [In Russ]. 

 

Abstract:

From January 2003 till January 2008 transhepatic endobiliar stenting was performed in 62 patients with obstructive jaundice due to high post-operative malignant strictures of hepaticocholedochus duct. In 49 cases (79 %) two-step intervention performed (biliary drainage followed by endobiliary stenting), 13 patients (21 %) underwent single-stage intervention. In 60 patients (96,8%) balloon dilatation was done prior to stent implantation. In 59 cases (95,2%) the procedure was completed by control drainage placement. Hospital stay for the endobiliary stenting procedure was 12,7-22,3 days (average hospital stay 17,5 days). Mortality was as high as 12,9% (8 cases). Average post-implantation life span appeared to be 9,7 months. In 5 patients (8,1%) mechanical jaundice relapse occurred, so they needed hospitalization for reintervention. Direct dependence found between the effectiveness of endobiliary stenting and the technical characteristics of stents, anatomy of biliary strictures, as well as the methods and techniques of the intervention. Single-stage endobiliary stenting, without prior drainage, decreases the complication rate, improves the quality of life during the hospital stay, and prolongs the post-implantation life expectancy. Single-stege interventions are also shown to decrease the hospital stay and reduce the costs. Balloon dilatation is the required stage of the intervention, especially if self-expandable stents are used in torturous biliary ducts. Post-implantation drainage placement can be skipped if the wall of the hepatico-choledochus duct is not edematous, there are no signs of tumor prolapse into the lumen, if the stent is completely expanded, and the contrast media evacuates easily into the intestine.

 

Reference

1.     Wiechel К. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography: technique and application withstudies of the hepatic venous and biliary ductpressures, the chemical changes in blood andbile and clinical results in a series of jaundicedpatients. Acta Chir Scand Suppl. 1964; 330(11): 1-99.

2.     Fern6ndez-Aguilar J., Santoyo J., Su6rezMuсoz M. et al. Biliary reconstruction in livertransplantation: is a biliary tutor necessary. Cir Esp. 2007; 82 (6): 338-340.

3.     Kasahara M., Egawa H., Takada Y. et al. Biliaryreconstruction in right lobe living-donor livertransplantation: Comparison of differenttechniques in 321 recipients. Annals of Surgery. 2006; 243 (4): 559-566.

4.     Alsharabi A., Zieniewicz K., Patkowski W. et al.Assessment of early biliary complications afterorthotopic liver transplantation and their relationship to the technique of biliary reconstruction. Transplantation proceedings. 2006; 38 (1): 244-246.

5.     Bahra M., Jacob D. Surgical palliation ofadvanced pancreatic cancer. Recent. Results. Cancer. Res. 2008; 177: 111-120.

6.     Das A., Sivak M.J. Endoscopic palliation forinoperable pancreatic cancer. Cancer. Control.2000; 7 (5): 452-457.

7.     Maire E, Hammel P., Ponsot P. et al. Long-term outcome of biliary and duodenal stents in palliative treatment of patients with unresectable adenocarcinoma of the head of pancreas. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006; 101 (4):735-742.

8.     Katsinelos P., Paikos D., Kountouras J. et al. Tannenbaum and metal stents in the palliative treatment of malignant distal bile duct obstruction: a comparative study of patency and cost effectiveness. SurgicalEndoscopy. 2006; 20 (10): 1587-1593.

9.     Hatzidakis A., Tsetis D., Chrysou E. et al. Nitinol stents for palliative treatment of malignant obstructive jaundice: Should we stent the sphincter of oddi in every case? Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 2001; 24: 245-248.

10.   Kaassis M., Boyer J., Dumas R. et al. Plastic or metal stents for malignant stricture of the common bile duct? Results of a randomized prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 57: 178-182.

11.   Ikeda S., Maeshiro K. Interventional treat ment of biliary stricture. Nippon. Geka. Gakkai. Zasshi. 2004; 105 (6): 374-379.

12.   Brountzos E., Ptochis N., Panagiotou I. et al. A survival analysis of patients with malignant biliary strictures treated by percutaneous metallic stenting. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 2007; 30(1): 66-73.

13.   Nakamura T., Hirai R., Kitagawa M. et al. Treatment of Common Bile Duct Obstruction by Pancreatic Cancer Using Various Stents: Single-Center Experience. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 2002; 25: 373-380.

14.   Tesdal I., Roeren T., Weiss С et al. Metallic stents for treatment of benign biliary obstruction: a long-term study comparing different stents. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2005; 16 (11): 1479-1487.

15.   Oikarinen H., Leinonen S., Karttunen A. et al. Patency and complications of percutaneously inserted metallic stents in malignant biliary obstruction.J. Vasc. Intervent. Radiol. 1999; 10: 1387-1393.

16.   Yoshida H., Taniai N., Mamada Y. et al. One-step palliative treatment method for obstructive jaundice caused by unresectable malignancies by percutaneous transhepatic insertion of an expandable metallic stent. J. World. J. Gastroenterol. 2006; 21; 12 (15): 2423-2426.

17.   Cowling M., Adam A. Internal stenting in malignant biliary obstruction. World. J. Surg. 2001; 25: 355-361.

18.   Isayama H., Komatsu Y., Tsujino T. et al. Polyurethane-covered metal stent for management of distal malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2002; 55 (3): 366-370.

19.   Yoon W., Lee J., Lee K. et al. A comparison of covered and uncovered Wallstents for the management of distal malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2006; 63 (7): 996-1000.

20.   Chen J., Sun C, Liao C, Chua C. Self-expandable metallic stents for malignant biliary obstruction: efficacy on proximal and distal tumors.J. World. J. Gastroenterol. 2006; 7; 12 (1): 119-122.

21.   Inal M., Aksungur E., Akgьl E. et al. Percutaneous Placement of Metallic Stents in Malignant Biliary Obstruction: One-Stage or Two-Stage Procedure? Pre-Dilate or Not? Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 2003; 26: 40-45.

 

Abstract:

The article aimes at determining the scope of multyspiral computer tomography (MSCT) in diagnostics of iatrogenic traumas of ureter and ureterovaginal fistulae (UVF) and establishing the efficiency of mini-invasive method of treatment UVF. The study covered 9 patients suffering the iatrogenic trauma of ureter, 8 of which have passed through MSCT. The mini-invasive methodic was applied to these patients and let the researchers restore the ureter tissue after the iartogenic trauma and eliminate the UVF without performing any open operations.

 

References

1.     Вайнберг З.С. Травма органов мочеполовой системы. Москва, Медпрактика-М, 2006 гл.10.

2.     Raney A. M. Ureteral trauma: Effects of ureteral ligation with and without deligation — experimental studies and case reports. / Urol. 1978; 119: 326 - 329.

3.     Spirnak J. P., Hampel N., Resnick M. I. Ureteral injuries complicating vascular reconstructive surgery: Is repair indicated?/ Urol, 1989; 141: 13 - 14.

4.     Канн Д.В. Руководство по акушерской и гинекологической урологии. М 1986; 481 - 6.

5.     Петров СБ., Шпиленя Е.С., Какушадзе З.А., Богданов А.Б. Повреждения мочеточников в гинекологической и акушерской практике. Журн. акушерства и жен. болезней. 2000; (49) 4: 31 - 34.

6.     Переверзев А.С. Актуальные проблемы оперативной урогинекологии. Современные проблемы урологии: Материалы VI Международного конгрессса урологов. Харьков, Факт., 1998; 3-9.

7.     Franke J.J., Smith J.A. Surgery of urether. Campbell's Urologie Walsh P.C. et al. - 7 th Ed., Vol.3., Philadelphia: WB.Saunders, 1998; 3062-3084.

8.     Bright ТС Emergency management of the injured ureter. Urol Clin North Am. 1982;9(2):285 - 291.

9.     Комяков Б.К., Гулиев Б.Г., Новиков А.И., Дорофеев С.Я., Лебедев М.А., Аль-Исса А. Оперативное лечение повреждений мочевых путей и их последствий в  акушерско-гинекологической  практике. Акушерство и гинекология 2004; 39 - 42.

10.   Еургеле Т., Симич П. Риск мочеточнико-пузырных повреждений в хирургии живота и таза. Бухарест 1972; 165-170.

11.   Gurin J. I., Garcia R. L., Melman A., Leiter E. The pathologic effect of ureteral ligation with clinical imply cations./ Urol, 1982;128: 1404- 1406.

12.   Hoch W H., Kursh E. D., Persky L. Early aggressive management of intraoperative ureteral injuries. J. Urol, 1975;114:530-532.

13.   Spirnak J. P., Hampel N., Resnick M. I. Ureteral injuries complicating vascular reconstructive surgery: Is repair indicated?/ Urol, 1989; 141: 13 - 14.

 

Abstract:

We have retrospectively analyzed results of 12 patients underwent radiological interventions for scarring strictures correction of biliodigestive anastomoses after reconstructive surgery due to iatrogenic damage of extra hepatic biliary ducts. It was determined that ultrasonography is the main technique of biliary hypertension diagnostics. Antegrade cholangiography gives an ability to determine the level and type of extrahepatic biliary ducts strictures. Adequate biliary decompression was achieved by transcutaneous transhepatic drainage of biliary tree with insertion of cholangiostomical drainage near the biliodigestive anastomoses. Antegrade recanalization technique and dilatation of biliodigestive anastomosis strictures was used for dilatation of scarring stricture. Balloon plastic of anastomoses was ended with forming of external-internal draining for 9-12 months with step-by-step balloon dilatations every 3 months. Stenting of biliodigestive anastomosis' strictures was made in 4 cases Postoperative period without relapses after radiological interventions lasts from 2 till 7 years of observing.

 

References 

1.    Хотиняну В.Ф., Фердохлеб А.Г., Хотиняну А.В. Хирургическое лечение больных со стриктурами внепеченочных желчных протоков. Анналы хирургической гепатологии. 2008; 13 (1): 61-65.

2.    Гальперин Э.И. Что должен делать хирург при повреждении желчных протоков? 50 лекций по хирургии. М.: Медиа Медика. 2003; 198-206.

3.    3. Гальперин Э.И., Чевокин А.Ю. Факторы, определяющие выбор операции при «свежих» повреждениях магистральных желчных протоков. Анналы хирургической гепатологии. 2009; 14 (1): 49-56.

4.    Руководство по хирургии желчных путей. Под ред. Э.И. Гальперина, П.С. Ветшева. М.: Издательский дом Видар-М. 2006; 568.

5.    Murr M.M. et al. Of biliary reconstruction after laparoscopic bile duct injuries. Arch. Surg. 1999; 134 (6): 604-610.

6.    Schmidt S.C. et al. Long-term results and risk factors influencing outcome of major bile duct injuries following cholecystectomy. Br. J.Surg. 2005; 92 (1): 76-82.

7.    McPherson S.J. et al. Percutaneous transjejunal biliary intervention. 10-year experience with access via Roux-en-Y loops. Radiology. 1998; 206: 665-672.

8.    Quintero G.A., Patino J.F. Surgical management of benign strictures of biliary tract.

9.    World. J. Surg. 2001; 25: 1245-1250. Корымасов Е.А., Богданов В.Е., Романов В.Е. и др. Эффективность эндобилиарных вмешательств при стриктурах протоков и анастомозов. Анналы хирургической гепатологии. 2008; 13 (3): 123-124.

10.  Хальзов А.В., Анищенко В.В., Штофин С.Г. Применение нитиноловых стентов для лечения посттравматических рубцовых стриктур внепеченочных желчных протоков. Анналы хирургической гепатологии. 2008; 13 (3): 144.

11.  Bismuth N., Majno P.E. Вiliary strictures. Classification based on the principle of surgical treatment.  World. J. Surg. 2001; 25  (10): 1241-1244.

 

ANGIOLOGIA.ru (АНГИОЛОГИЯ.ру) - портал о диагностике и лечении заболеваний сосудистой системы